I believe that Faulkner is
correct on his theory that in order for technology to develop, it needs to be planned
for with diversity in mind. Creating tech that only works for one group, limits the capabilities
of that device or system and prevents accessibility for many. By receiving feedback
from various groups, it allows for new concepts to surface and for innovation
to give shape. By inviting as many people into the conversation, the product(s)
can evolve and it allows for the flaws to be found faster, the questions and
concerns to be revealed and actively discussed and for the ideas for the next
stage of development to take place. Without diversity, a product can suffer
from being niche. This is problematic because people exist in all areas of the
world and the environment in which these people live are also extremely significant
to the development of the tech. By having a product that can be used anywhere/
everywhere, it becomes more appealing to the consumers, which can generate a
profit that can inspire funds for further development. If people limited women,
they would be neglecting potential buyers, users, consumers and all the
possible outcomes that relate to that demographic. This is why I believe that
everyone should be invited and allowed to participate in any discussion. After that its impact on the environment and the living organisms and ecosystems around us, should also be discussed and accounted for. The development of technology should be responsible, considerate and geared at sustainability for true development to occur.


Yes this is why having a participatory design process is so important!
ReplyDelete